User agent detail

LG-CU920/V1.0s Obigo/Q05A Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-obigo.yaml
Obigo Q 5A LGCU920mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo 5.0 JAVA LGCU920Mobile Phoneyes0.027 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
LG-CU920 V1.0scloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo closeJVM LGCU920mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo Q05A LGCU920smartphoneyes0.012 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 5close LGCU920closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo Q05A Browser Q05A LGLGCU920closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo Q 5A LGCU920mobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Teleca Obigo Q05Aclose LGCU920Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:11 | by ThaDafinser