User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0(Java; U; MIDP-2.0; fr-fr; generic) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/8.7.0.218 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-539.php
UC Browser 8.7JAVA unknownunknown unknowngeneral Mobile PhoneMobile Phoneyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 8.7U2 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close LGC300mobile-browseryescloseclose3.33242 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.7 0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.7.0close closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.06101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.7.0.218 Mobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.7Gecko Android mobile:smartyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:10 | by ThaDafinser