User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.0.3; en-us; AT200 Build/IML74K) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Safari/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tablet-1.yml
Android Browser Android 4.0.3WebKit ToshibaRegza AT200tablet Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.0ToshibaExcite AT200Tabletyesyes0.111 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0.3ToshibaAT200mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25405 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.0ToshibaRegza AT200tabletyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.0.3closeAndroid 4.0.3ToshibaAT200closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.06201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 534.30Android 4.0.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42709 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 534.30Android 4.0.3ToshibaRegza AT200tabletyescloseclose0.039 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0ToshibaAT200Tabletyesyescloseclose0.187 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:10 | by ThaDafinser