User agent detail

iBrowser/Mini2.8 (Nokia5130c-2/07.97)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia5130c-2 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
iBrowser 2.8WebKit Mobile Phoneyesyes0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
iBrowser Mini2.8closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IBrowse close desktop-browsercloseclose0.18204 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
IBrowse Symbian Nokia5130c-2smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 07.97)closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
iBrowser Mini 2.8close Nokia5130c-2closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Nokia Browser NokiaOS NokiaNokia 5130c-2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42008 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
iBrowser Mini 2.8 Series40 Nokia5130 XpressMusicmobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.021 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:09 | by ThaDafinser