User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0;Windows CE; IEMobile 8.12; MSIEMobile 6.0) Vodafone/1.0/HTC_Touch_Diamond_II_T5353/1.40.163.2 (49069)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCTouch_Diamond_II_T5353 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 6.0Trident Windows DesktopDesktop0.031 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
IEMobile 8.12closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE Mobile 8.12closeWindows HTCP5310BMmobile-browseryescloseclose0.18404 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
IE Mobile 8.12Trident Windows CE HTCTouch Diamond II T5353smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows CEclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE Mobile 8.12closeWindows CE HTCTouch_Diamond_II_T5353closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
IE Mobile 8.12closeWindows CE closecloseclosecloseclose0.07902 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer Mobile Windows HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41508 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Mobile Internet Explorer 6.0 Windows Mobile 6.5HTCTouch Diamond 2mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile closeWindows Mobile Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.02 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:09 | by ThaDafinser