User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.4.3; zh-CN; J188+ Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/534.31 (KHTML, like Gecko) UCBrowser/9.3.1.344 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/534.31
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-563.php
UC Browser 9.3Android 4.4unknown unknowngeneral Mobile PhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.3U3 Android 4.4Mobile Phoneyesyes0.022 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 534.31closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser 9.3.1.344closeAndroid 4.4.3GenericAndroidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.27906 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.3WebKit Android 4.4yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.4.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.3.1closeAndroid 4.4.3J188+closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.07202 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.3.1.344WebKit 534.31Android 4.4.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41208 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.3Webkit 534.31Android 4.2.2J188+mobile:smartyescloseclose0.09101 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:08 | by ThaDafinser