User agent detail

Safari/7536.30.1 CFNetwork/520.5.1 Darwin/11.4.2 (i386) (MacBook3,1)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Mac OS X 10.7.4 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 5.0WebKit MacOSX 10.7AppleMacintoshDesktop0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 7536.30.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari closeOS X 10.7.5desktop-browsercloseclose0.22104 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit Mac 10.7desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
CFNetwork 520.5.1closeMac OS X 10.7.4AppleMacBook3,1closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeDarwin closecloseclosecloseclose0.24305 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari Darwin closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.43109 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari OS X Lion 10.7.5desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
CFNetwork App closeMac OS X Desktopcloseclose0.021 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:08 | by ThaDafinser