User agent detail

HTC-Radar C110e/UCWEB2.2.0.157/47/355
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCRadar C110e Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
HTC-Radar closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19604 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 2.2 HTCRadarsmartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 2.2.0close HTCRadar C110ecloseclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.2.0.157close closecloseclosecloseclose0.07001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 2.2.0.157 HTC Radarcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.59812 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 2.2Gecko HTCRadar C110emobile:featureyescloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:08 | by ThaDafinser