User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; it-IT) AppleWebKit/532.5 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/4.0.249.25 Safari/532.5
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-chrome.yaml
Chrome 4Windows 7Webkit 532.5desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 4.0WebKit Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.032 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 4.0.249.25closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 4.0.249.25closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.18504 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 4.0WebKit Windows 7desktop0.011 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 4.0.249.25closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 4.0.249closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 4.0.249.25closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.06801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 4.0.249.25WebKit 532.5Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.4981 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 4Webkit 532.5Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 4.0.249.25closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 4.1.249.1025closeWindows VistaDesktopcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:08 | by ThaDafinser