User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Nintendo 3DS like iPhone) Version/1.7412.JP
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/gaming/nintendo.yaml
1.7412 Nintendo3DSgaming:portableyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mobile Safari UIWebView WebKit iOS AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes0.049 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
NintendoBrowser 1.7412.JPcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
No result found
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NetFront iOS Nintendo3DSconsoleyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront NX close closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Netfront Browser NX 1.7412.JPNetFront NintendoNintendo 3DScloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40708 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
1.7412Nintendo3DSgaming:portableyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 5.1closeiOS AppleiPhoneFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:08 | by ThaDafinser