User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_10_1) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/41.0.2272.53 Safari/537.36 OPR/28.0.1750.31 (Edition beta)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera Beta 28.0OS X Yosemite 10.10Blink 537.36desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 28.0Blink MacOSX 10.10AppleMacintoshDesktop0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 28.0.1750.31closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 28.0.1750.31closeOS X 10.10.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.19504 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 28.0Blink Mac 10.10desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 28.0.1750.31closeOS X 10.10.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 28.0.1750closeMac OS X 10.10.1closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 41.0.2272.53closeOS X 10.10.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.04601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 28.0.1750.31WebKit 537.36Mac OS X 10.10.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40308 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Beta 28.0Blink OS X Yosemite 10.10desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 28.0.1750.31closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 28.0.1750.31closeMac OS X 10.10.1Desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:07 | by ThaDafinser