User agent detail

Opera/9.52 (Windows NT 5.1; U; ja)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
woothee/woothee-testset
/testsets/pc_windows.yaml
Opera 9.52Windows XP NT 5.1 pc Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 9.52Presto 2.0WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.52closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 9.52closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.24405 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 9.52Presto Windows XPdesktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 9.52closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.52closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 9.52closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.05501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 9.52 Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41008 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 9.52 Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.52closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 9.26closeIntel Mac OS X Desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:07 | by ThaDafinser