User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.4.3; xx; KFARWI Build/KTU84M) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Silk/3.41 like Chrome/37.0.2026.117 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/tablet/os-fireos.yaml
Silk 3.41FireOS 4.5Blink 537.36AmazonFire HD 6tabletyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Silk 3.41Blink Android 4.4AmazonKindleEbook Readeryesyes0.021 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Silk 3.41closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 37.0.2026.117closeAndroid 4.4.3desktop-browsercloseclose0.27005 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 37.0Blink Android 4.4AmazonFire HD 6tabletyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 37.0.2026.117closeAndroid 4.4.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Amazon Silk 3.41closeAndroid 4.4.3AmazonKindlecloseclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.18604 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Silk 3.41WebKit 537.36Fire OS AmazonKindlecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40208 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Silk 3.41Blink FireOS 4.5AmazonFire HD 6tabletyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 37.0.2026.117closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 37closeAndroid 4.4AmazonKFARWITabletyesyescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:07 | by ThaDafinser