User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (DirectFB; U; Linux mips; en) AppleWebKit/531.2+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/531.2+ LG Browser/4.0.10(+SCREEN+TUNER; LGE; 32LD650-SA; 06.00.00; 0x00000001;); LG NetCast.TV-2010
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LG32LD650-SA Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 531.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 531.2closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18904 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit GNU/Linux LGNetCasttv0.015 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
WebKit Nightly 531.2closeLinux LG32LD650-SAcloseclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 531.2Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40908 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
LG Browser 4.0Webkit 531.2 LG32LD650-SA NetCast TV 2010televisioncloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.077 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:06 | by ThaDafinser