User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Linux armv6l; U; NETRANGEMMH;HbbTV/1.1.1;CE-HTML/1.0;PEAQ LF1V350; en) Presto/2.8.115 Version/11.10
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tv.yml
Opera 11.10GNU/Linux Presto 2.8.115PEAQLF1V350tv Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 11.10Presto 2.8Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 11.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 11.10closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.20604 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 11.10Presto GNU/Linux PEAQLF1V350tv0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 11.10closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 11.10closeLinux PEAQLF1V350closeclosecloseclose0.016 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 11.10closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.08702 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 11.10Presto 2.8.115Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40708 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Devices 3.0Presto 2.8.115 televisioncloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 11.10closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:06 | by ThaDafinser