User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040707 Lightningspider/0.9.2
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
Lightningspider 0.9.2 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mozilla 1.7Gecko 1.7WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.062 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Mozilla rv:1.7closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.19004 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesLightningspiderclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla 1.7closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.08002 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 1.7Gecko 20040707Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close yescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:05 | by ThaDafinser