User agent detail

%%%%Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-AU) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/30.0.1599.114 Safari/537.36 Puffin/4.4.1IT%%%%
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-725.php
yesFake BrowserBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesFake BrowserBot/Crawler0.034 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.114closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Puffin 4.4.1closeiOS AppleiPadmobile-browseryescloseclose0.21304 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Puffin 4.4WebKit GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.114closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Puffin 4.4.1closeLinux AppleiPadcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 30.0.1599.114closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Puffin 4.4.1WebKit 537.36 iPadcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40108 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Puffin 4.4.1Blink iOS iPadtabletyescloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.114closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 30.0.1599.114closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:05 | by ThaDafinser