User agent detail

SonyEricssonT290i/R101
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SonyEricssonT290i Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SonyEricssonT290i R101closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close Sony EricssonT290imobile-browseryescloseclose0.18704 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Sony EricssonT290ifeature phoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close SonyEricssonT290icloseclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Sony EricssonSony Ericsson T290icloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.47009 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Sony EricssonT290imobile:featureyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close SonyEricssonT290iFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.024 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:05 | by ThaDafinser