User agent detail

com.google.android.youtube/2.4.4(Linux; U; Android 2.3.5; en_US; SCH-I500 Build/GINGERBREAD) gzip
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/mobile_apps.yml
YouTube 2.4.4Android 2.3.5 SamsungSCH-I500smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
com closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 2.3.5SamsungFascinatemobile-browseryescloseclose0.25705 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
YouTube 2.4 Android 2.3SamsungSCH-I500smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 2.3.5closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.3.5closeAndroid 2.3.5SamsungSCH-I500closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android 2.3.5Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41608 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android 2.3.5SamsungFascinatemobile:smartyescloseclose0.042 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.3closeAndroid 2.3Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.034 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:04 | by ThaDafinser