User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; ARCHOS 79 Platinum Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/33.0.1750.166 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Archos79 Platinum Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 33.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.168 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.166closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 33.0.1750.166closeAndroid 4.2.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.27605 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 33.0Blink Android 4.2Archos79 Platinumtabletyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.166closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 33.0.1750closeAndroid 4.2.2Archos79 Platinumcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.08002 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 33.0.1750.166WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40508 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 33Blink Android 4.2.2Archos79 Platinumtabletyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.166closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 42closeAndroid 4.2Tabletyesyescloseclose0.118 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:03 | by ThaDafinser