User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; TP8-1000 Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/28.0.1500.64 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
ionikTP8-1000 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 28.0Blink Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.15 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.64closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 28.0.1500.64closeAndroid 4.0.4desktop-browsercloseclose0.27505 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 28.0Blink Android 4.0tabletyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.64closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 28.0.1500closeAndroid 4.0.4ionikTP8-1000closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.07802 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 28.0.1500.64WebKit 537.36Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40308 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 28.0.1500.64Blink Android 4.0.4TP8-1000tabletyescloseclose0.08401 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.64closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Tabletyesyescloseclose0.12 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:03 | by ThaDafinser