User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.0.4; en-us; PJ83100/2.20.502.7 Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-436.php
Android 4.0Android 4.0unknown HTCOne XMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.0HTCOne XMobile Phoneyesyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0.4HTCPJ83100mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25405 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.0yes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.0.4closeAndroid 4.0.4PJ83100/2.20.502.7closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.10002 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 534.30Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40508 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 534.30Android 4.0.4HTCOne Xmobile:smartyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0HTCPJ83100Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.067 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:03 | by ThaDafinser