User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_10_5) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/1.0.0.39 Safari/535.19
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/camouflage.yaml
Chrome Dev 1.0.0.39OS X Yosemite 10.10Webkit 535.19desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome Blink MacOSX 10.10AppleMacintoshDesktop0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 1.0.0.39closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 1.0.0.39closeOS X 10.10.5desktop-browsercloseclose0.17903 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 1.0WebKit Mac 10.10desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 1.0.0.39closeOS X 10.10.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 1.0.0closeMac OS X 10.10.5closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 1.0.0.39closeOS X 10.10.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.05001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 1.0.0.39WebKit 535.19Mac OS X 10.10.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 1.0.0.39Webkit 535.19OS X Yosemite 10.10desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 1.0.0.39closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 1.0.0.39closeMac OS X 10.10.5Desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:02 | by ThaDafinser