User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows 95; de; rv:1.9.2.6) Gecko/20100625 Firefox/27.0.1 (de) Anonymisiert durch AlMiSoft Browser-Maulkorb 68827872
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-436.php
Firefox 27.0Win95 9527.0 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 27.0Gecko 27.0Win95 95Windows DesktopDesktop0.068 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 27.0.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 27.0.1closeWindows 95desktop-browsercloseclose0.18504 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 27.0Gecko Windows 95desktop0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 27.0.1closeWindows 95closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 27.0.1closeWindows 95 closeclosecloseclose0.04 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 27.0.1closeWindows 95 closecloseclosecloseclose0.06901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 27.0.1Gecko 20100625Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40508 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 27.0.1Gecko 1.9.2Windows 95desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 27.0.1closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 27.0closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.087 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:02 | by ThaDafinser