User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (BeOS; U; Haiku BePC; xx; rv:1.8.1.25pre) Gecko/20120921 BonEcho/2.0.0.22pre
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-haiku.yaml
Firefox BonEcho 2.0.0.22Haiku Gecko 1.8.1desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mozilla 1.8Gecko 1.8 Desktop0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox (BonEcho) 2.0.0.22precloseHaiku OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.17704 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox BonEcho (2.0Gecko Haiku OS desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 1.8closeBeOS closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Bon Echo 2.0.0close closeclosecloseclose0.017 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
BonEcho 2.0.0.22precloseHaiku closecloseclosecloseclose0.05901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 1.8.1.25preGecko 20120921BeOS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41008 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox BonEcho 2.0.0.22Gecko 1.8.1Haiku desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:02 | by ThaDafinser