User agent detail

SAMSUNG-SGH-T159V/1.0 SHP/VPP/R5 NetFront/4.2 SMM-MMS/1.2.0 profile/MIDP-2.1 configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSGH-T159V Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
NetFront 4.2NetFront JAVA Mobile Phoneyesyes0.021 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-SGH-T159V 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront 4.2closeJVM mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18504 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NetFront 4.2NetFront SamsungSGH-T159Vsmartphoneyes0.013 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront 4.2close SamsungSGH-T159Vcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
NetFront 4.2close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
NetFront Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.43109 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NetFront 4.2 SamsungSGH-T159Vmobile:featureyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:01 | by ThaDafinser