User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.5; zh-cn; K-Touch T621 Build/MocorDroid2.3.5) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko)Version/4.0 MQQBrowser/4.5 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-1.yml
QQ Browser 4.5MocorDroid 2.3.5WebKit K-TouchT621smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.101 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 2.3.5K-TouchT621mobile-browseryescloseclose0.27105 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
QQ Browser 4.5WebKit MocorDroid 2.3K-TouchT621smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.3.5closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mobile 4.5closeAndroid 2.3.5KtouchT621closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.3.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.17904 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQ Browser 4.5WebKit 533.1Android 2.3.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40908 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QQ Browser 4.5Webkit 533.1Android 2.3.5K-TouchT621mobile:smartyescloseclose0.024 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.3closeAndroid 2.3K-TouchT621Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.043 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:01 | by ThaDafinser