User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) KHTML/4.9.3 (like Gecko) Konqueror/4.9 SUSE
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Konqueror 4.9SUSE KHTML 4.9.3desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Konqueror 4.9KHTML 4.9Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Konqueror 4.9closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18704 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Konqueror 4.9KHTML SUSE desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Konqueror 4.9closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Konqueror 4.9closeSUSE closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Konqueror 4.9closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.09102 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Konqueror 4.9 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40808 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Konqueror 4.9KHTML 4.9.3SUSE desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:01 | by ThaDafinser