User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/34.0.1847.132 Safari/537.36 OPR/21.0.1432.67
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-298.php
Opera 21.0Win7 6.1unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 21.0Blink Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.069 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 21.0.1432.67closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 21.0.1432.67closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.18404 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 21.0Blink Windows 7desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 21.0.1432.67closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 21.0.1432closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 34.0.1847.132closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.07802 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 21.0.1432.67WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40908 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 21.0Blink Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 21.0.1432.67closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 21.0.1432.67closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:01 | by ThaDafinser