User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.1.1; de-de; CAPTIVA PAD 10 Build/JRO03H) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Safari/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
CaptivaPAD 10 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.1GenericAndroid 4.1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25705 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.1CaptivaPad PAD 10tabletyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.1.1closeAndroid 4.1.1CaptivaPAD 10closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.05401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 534.30Android 4.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41908 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 534.30Android 4.1.1CaptivaPad 10.1tabletyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Tabletyesyescloseclose0.055 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:01 | by ThaDafinser