User agent detail

Huawei/1.0/0HuaweiG6610V/SW03 Browser/Obigo-Browser/Q03C MMS/Obigo-MMS/1.2
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HuaweiG6610V Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo 3.0 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.029 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Huawei 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo Q 3close HuaweiG6610Vmobile-browseryescloseclose0.21104 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo HuaweiG6610Vsmartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo close HuaweiG6610Vcloseclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo Browser closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40708 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo Q 3C HuaweiG6610Vmobile:featureyescloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
emobile closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Teleca Obigo close HuaweiG6610VFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.036 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:38:00 | by ThaDafinser