User agent detail

Coolpad8198T_CMCC_TD/1.0 Linux/3.4.5 Android/4.2.1 Release/06.30.2013 Browser/1.0 Profile/MIDP-1.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone.yml
Android Browser Android 4.2.1WebKit Coolpad8198Tsmartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Coolpad8198T closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 4.2.1Coolpad8198Tmobile-browseryescloseclose0.25605 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.2Coolpad8198Tsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid 4.2.1closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42209 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android 4.2.1Coolpad8198Tmobile:smartyescloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 4.2closeAndroid 4.2Coolpad8198TSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.044 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:58 | by ThaDafinser