User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SMART-TV; X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/535.20+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0 Safari/535.20+
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tv.yml
Safari 5.0GNU/Linux WebKit 535.20SamsungSmart TVtv Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 5.0WebKit Linux SamsungSmart TVTV Device0.024 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 5.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18704 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari 5.0WebKit GNU/Linux SamsungSmart TVtv0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
WebKit Nightly 535.20closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.07802 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 535.20Smart TV closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41908 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 535.20 SamsungSmart TVtelevisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 5.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:58 | by ThaDafinser