User agent detail

Amoi-A869/Plat-V-FT/WAP2.0/MIDP2.0/CLDC1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
AmoiA869 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Amoi JAVA Mobile Deviceyes0.007 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Amoi-A869 Platcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close AmoiA869mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18504 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
AmoiA869smartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close AmoiA869closeclosecloseclose0.023 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
AmoiA869mobile:featureyescloseclose0.018 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:57 | by ThaDafinser