User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Series40; Nokia113/03.09; Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1) Gecko/20100401 S40Ov
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia113 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.169 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
closeSeries40 Nokia113mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19104 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser Gecko Symbian OS Series 40 Nokia113smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 03.09;closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia 113closeNokia Series 40 Nokia113closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.13303 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Nokia Browser Gecko 20100401NokiaOS NokiaNokia 113closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40808 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Gecko Series40 Nokia113mobile:featureyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:57 | by ThaDafinser