User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; CrOS i686 6163.0.2014) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/39.0.2126.0 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-chromeos.yaml
Chrome Dev 39.0.2126.0Chrome OS Blink 537.36desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 39.0Blink ChromeOS Linux DesktopDesktop0.037 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 39.0.2126.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 39.0.2126.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 39.0Blink Chrome OS 6163.0desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 39.0.2126.0closeChrome OS 39.0.2126.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 39.0.2126closeChrome OS 6163.0.2014closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 39.0.2126.0closeChrome OS 6163.0.2014closecloseclosecloseclose0.07301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 39.0.2126.0WebKit 537.36ChromeOS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 39.0.2126.0Blink Chrome OS desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 39.0.2126.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 39.0.2171.99closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.026 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:56 | by ThaDafinser