User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.16 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/10.0.648.11 Safari/534.16
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-chrome.yaml
Chrome 10Linux Webkit 534.16desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 10.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.051 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 10.0.648.11closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 10.0.648.11closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 10.0WebKit GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 10.0.648.11closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 10.0.648closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 10.0.648.11closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 10.0.648.11WebKit 534.16Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 10Webkit 534.16Linux desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 10.0.648.11closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:56 | by ThaDafinser