User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.1.2; En-us; USCC-US780 Build/JZO54K) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, Like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
CellularUS780 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.2GenericAndroid 4.1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.36604 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.1yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.1.2closeAndroid 4.1.2CellularUS780closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.06401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 534.30Android 4.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 534.30Android 4.1.2LGOptimus F7mobile:smartyescloseclose0.023 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.056 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:55 | by ThaDafinser