User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SMART-TV; X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/534.7 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0 Safari/534.7
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/samsung.yaml
Webkit 534.7SamsungSmart TVtelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 5.0WebKit Linux SamsungSmart TVTV Device0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 5.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.23902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari 5.0WebKit GNU/Linux SamsungSmart TVtv0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 5.0closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 534.7Smart TV closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 534.7 SamsungSmart TVtelevisioncloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 5.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.007 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:54 | by ThaDafinser