User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (MIDP-2.0; U; Adr 5.0.2; en-US; AO5510) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-685.php
UC Browser 0.0Android 5.0unknown YUYurekaMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser U2 Android 5.0YUYurekaMobile Phoneyesyes0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close MicromaxAQ4501mobile-browseryescloseclose0.27603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser Android 5.0yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid 5.0.2closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.06001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 2.0 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.51805 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser Gecko Android 5.0.2AO5510mobile:smartyescloseclose0.08101 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:54 | by ThaDafinser