User agent detail

Amoi-V600/Plat-EMP/WAP2.0/MIDP2.0/CLDC1.0 UP.Link/5.1.2.6
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
AmoiV600 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 5.1 Mobile Phoneyes0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Amoi-V600 Platcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close AmoiV600mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
AmoiV600smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close AmoiV600closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
AmoiV600mobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close AmoiV600Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.043 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:54 | by ThaDafinser