User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; XT1056 Build/13.9.0Q2.X-116-1) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/27.0.1453.90 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaXT1056 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 27.0WebKit Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.132 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 27.0.1453.90closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 27.0.1453.90closeAndroid 4.2.2MotorolaXT1056mobile-browseryescloseclose0.27003 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 27.0WebKit Android 4.2MotorolaMoto Xsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 27.0.1453.90closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 27.0.1453closeAndroid 4.2.2MotorolaXT1056closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 27.0.1453.90WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 27Blink Android 4.2.2MotorolaMoto Xmobile:smartyescloseclose0.043 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 27.0.1453.90closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 27closeAndroid 4.2MotorolaXT1056Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.071 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:54 | by ThaDafinser