User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.2.2; fr-fr; TECNO M3 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) FlyFlow/1.4 Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-3.yml
Android Browser Android 4.2.2WebKit Tecno MobileM3smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
FlyFlow 1.4WebKit Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.046 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2TecnoM3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26203 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.2Tecno MobileM3smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Baidu Explorer 1.4closeAndroid 4.2.2TecnoM3closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.12501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 534.30Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Baidu Browser 1.4Webkit 534.30Android 4.2.2TecnoM3mobile:smartyescloseclose0.03 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.2closeAndroid 4.2TecnoM3Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.039 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:53 | by ThaDafinser