User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:32.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/32.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-266.php
Firefox 32.0Ubuntu unknown32.0 unknownLinux DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 32.0Gecko 32.0Ubuntu Linux DesktopDesktop0.072 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 32.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 32.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 32.0Gecko Ubuntu desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 32.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 32.0closeUbuntu closeclosecloseclose0.021 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 32.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.046 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 32.0Gecko 20100101Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.45905 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 32.0Gecko 32.0Ubuntu desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 32.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 32.0.3closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.087 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:53 | by ThaDafinser