User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.2; Archos 80 Xenon Build/JZO54K) AppleWebKit/537.31 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/26.0.1410.58 Safari/537.31
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Archos80 Xenon Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 26.0WebKit Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.034 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 26.0.1410.58closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 26.0.1410.58closeAndroid 4.1.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.25203 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 26.0WebKit Android 4.1Archos80 Xenontabletyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 26.0.1410.58closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 26.0.1410closeAndroid 4.1.2Archos80 Xenoncloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.05 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 26.0.1410.58WebKit 537.31Android 4.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 26.0.1410.58Webkit 537.31Android 4.1.2Archos80 Xenontabletyescloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 26.0.1410.58closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Archos80 XenonTabletyesyescloseclose0.107 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:53 | by ThaDafinser