User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SymbianOS/9.3; U; Series60/3.2 Samsung/I7110/XNHJ8 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 ) AppleWebKit/413 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/413
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungI7110 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Samsung Mobile Browser WebKit SymbianOS SamsungGT-I7110Mobile Phoneyes0.232 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 413closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Nokia Web Browser closeSymbian OS 9.3SamsungI7110mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia OSS Browser 3.2WebKit Symbian OS Series 60 3.2SamsungI7110smartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia OSS Browser 3.2closeSymbian OS 9.3SamsungI7110closeclosecloseclose0.013 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Browser for S60 OSS 3.2closeSymbianOS 9.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.04901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser WebKit 413Symbian closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 413Series60 3.2SamsungI7110mobile:smartyescloseclose0.026 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Symbian S60 Browser closeSymbian S60 9.3SamsungI7110Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.04 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:52 | by ThaDafinser