User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; LG-D802 Build/JDQ39B) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/33.0.1750.136 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-1.yml
Chrome Mobile 33.0.1750.136Android 4.2.2Blink LGD802smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 33.0Blink Android 4.2LGG2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.061 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.136closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 33.0.1750.136closeAndroid 4.2.2LGD802mobile-browseryescloseclose0.27903 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 33.0Blink Android 4.2LGD802smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.136closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 33.0.1750closeAndroid 4.2.2LGD802closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.07201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 33.0.1750.136WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2LGLGD802closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 33Blink Android 4.2.2LGG2mobile:smartyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.136closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 33closeAndroid 4.2LGD802Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.076 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:52 | by ThaDafinser