User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; u; Linux; C) AppleWebKit /533.3 (Khtml, like Gheko) QtCarBrowser Safari/533.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/car_browser.yml
Safari GNU/Linux WebKit TeslaModel Scar browser Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 533.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 533.3closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.34303 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit GNU/Linux TeslaModel Scar browser0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QtCarBrowser 1closeLinux TeslaModel Scloseclosecloseclose0.013 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.10501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QTCarBrowser WebKit Linux Tesla Model S Dashboardcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
TeslaModel Scarcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:52 | by ThaDafinser