User agent detail

Opera/9.70 (Linux armv6l ; U; CE-HTML/1.0 NETTV/2.0.2; en) Presto/2.2.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tv.yml
Opera 9.70GNU/Linux Presto 2.2.1PhilipsNetTV Seriestv Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.023 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.70closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 9.70closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 9.70Presto GNU/Linux PhilipsNetTV Seriestv0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 9.70closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.70closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 9.70closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 9.70Presto 2.2.1Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Devices 9.7Presto 2.2.1 PhilipsNet TVtelevisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.70closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:50 | by ThaDafinser