User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 1.6; Ja-jp; SH-10B Build/S1110) AppleWebKit/528.5+ (KHTML, Like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Mobile Safari/525.20.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SharpSH-10B Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 3.1WebKit Android 1.6Sharp10BMobile Phoneyes0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 3.1.2closeAndroid 1.6GenericAndroid 1.6mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26003 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 1.6SharpSH-10Bsmartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 3.1.2closeAndroid 1.6closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 1.6closeAndroid 1.6SharpSH-10Bcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 1.6closecloseclosecloseclose0.11201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 3.1.2WebKit 528.5Android 1.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 528.5Android 1.6SharpLYNX SH-10Bmobile:smartyescloseclose0.04 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 44closeAndroid 1.6Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.062 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:50 | by ThaDafinser